Vol. 1 (2026)
Articles

Green Climate Fund and Eurasian Economic Union: Towards Convergent Interaction of Member States in Climate Finance Area

Mark Shugurov
Department of International law of Saratov State Law Academy, Chernyshevsky st., 104, Saratov, Russia, 410056

Published 2026-11-06

Keywords

  • Green climate fund,
  • Climate agenda,
  • Green finance,
  • EAEU,
  • Climate projects

How to Cite

Green Climate Fund and Eurasian Economic Union: Towards Convergent Interaction of Member States in Climate Finance Area . (2026). Journal of Global Economics, Public Policy and Development, 1, 114-144. https://doi.org/10.65638/2979-5842.2026.1.07

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to form and substantiate a theoretical model of coordinated interaction between the EAEU member states and the Green Climate Fund as one of the directions of the Union’s climate agenda. Achieving this purpose was based on the following key methods: 1) the comparative method made it possible to compare the achieved level of cooperation between the member states of the EAEU and the Fund and also the degree of their progress towards direct interaction with latter; 2) the analytical method was used during the consideration of statistical material concerning the negative impact of climate change on the EAEU member states; 3) a systematic approach became the basis for identifying the integration of cooperation with the Fund into the mainstream of the climate agenda of the Union and its member states; 4) the modeling method made it possible to formulate a theoretical structure of possible interaction between the EAEU as an integration association of states and the Fund. The study demonstrated that several EAEU member states (Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan and Armenia) are actively is carrying out programs and projects supported by the Fund, which not only relate to various sectors, but also support the formation of a mature climate policy in these states. In general, this group of countries is in a stage of transition to a mature institutional phase of interaction with the Fund. The second group of states (Russia and Belarus) do not participate in the Fund’s projects, but maintain specific relations with it. The author substantiates that, despite such divergence, the Union’s climate agenda involves interaction with the Fund at the integration level as some international track for the Union’s positioning. The essence of this track is inclusion in interaction with the global climate finance system.

References

  1. Andreeva LYu, Vovchenko NG (2017) Institutions and instruments of “green financing”: risks and opportunities for sustainable development of the Russian economy. Forestry Journal 2: 205–214. https://doi.org/10.12737/article_5967eb0ccff307.47958130 (In Russ.).
  2. Arkhipova VV (2017) “Green finance” as a means to solve global problems // Economic Journal of the Higher School of Economics 21(2): 312–322. (In Russ.).
  3. Bank of Russia (2022) Climate risks in changing economic conditions. Report for public consultations. Moscow, 51 p. http://www.cbr.ru/Content/Document/File/143643/Consultation_Paper_21122022.pdf
  4. Bazhenov IN (2018) “Green” financing: global trends and Russian practice. Problems of National Strategy 5(50): 172–186. (In Russ.).
  5. Belousov AL (2022) Legal and organizational aspects of introducing ESG-standards in the Russian banking sector. Russ J Econ Law 16: 577–586. (In Russ.).
  6. Bobylev SN, Kiryushkin PA, Koshkina NR (2021) New priorities for the economy and green financing. Econ Revival Russia 1: 152–166. https://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2021-1-67-152-166 (In Russ.).
  7. Brewer T (2008) Climate change technology transfer: a new paradigm and policy. Climate Policy. 8(5): 516–526.
  8. Doszhan RD., Sabidullina AE., Nurmagambetova AZ., Kozhakhmetova AK (2022) Green financing in Kazakhstan: current state and prospects. Economics: the strategy and practice. 17(4):170 –184. https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2022-4-170-184 (In Russ.).
  9. Dudin MN, Shkodinskiy SV, Kushnir AM (2022) Prerequisites for expanding green financing and ESG practices in the Russian banking sector. Econ Entrep Law 12: 1301–1322. https://doi.org/10.18334/epp.12.4.114551 (In Russ.).
  10. Emelyanova ES (2022) Climate systemic risks in Europe and the introduction of systemic buffers for mitigating climate risks. Bulletin of the Academy of Knowledge 49(2): 108–116. (In Russ.).
  11. Falcone PM (2020) Environmental regulation and green investments: The role of green finance. International Journal of Green Economics 14(2): 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGE.2020.109735
  12. Hafner S, Jones A, Anger-Kraavi A, Pohl J (2019) Closing the green finance gap – A systems perspective. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 34:26–60. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.007
  13. Kissinger G, Gupta A, Mulder I, Unterstell N (2019) Climate financing needs in the land sector under the Paris Agreement: An assessment of developing country perspectives. Land Use Policy 83: 256–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.007
  14. Kempa L, Zamarioli L, Pauw WP, Çevik C (2021) Financing measures to avert, minimize and address loss and damage: options for the Green Climate Fund. Frankfurt SchoolUNEP Center research paper.
  15. Karimov US (2024) Green finance as a tool to stimulate investments in environmentally sustainable projects. Vestnik universiteta 7: 162–169. (In Russ.).
  16. Kolesnikova KV, Makarova TI (2021) On the issue of the elements of the economic mechanism of environmental protection and environmental management in the EAEU countries. Humanitarian and Legal Studies 1: 161–167. (In Russ.).
  17. Kononovich IV (2023) Green integration - a new stage in the development of the green economy of countries? // Bulletin of the Transbaikal State University 1: 95–103. https://doi.org/10.21209/2227-9245-2023-29-1-95-103 (In Russ.).
  18. Linnenluecke MK., Smith T, McKnight B (2016) Environmental finance: A research agenda for interdisciplinary finance research. Economic Modelling 59: 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econ mod.2016.07.010
  19. Little LR., Hobday AJ, Parslow J, Davies CR., Grafton RQ (2015). Funding climate adaptation strategies with climate derivatives. Climate Risk Management 8: 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. crm.2015.02.002
  20. Lifshits IM, Smbatyan AS, Saliya MR (2024) Implementation of the Paris Climate Agreement in the Legal Systems of the EAEU Member States. Lex Russica. 77(1): 103–118. https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2024.206.1.103-118 (In Russ.).
  21. Lottje C, Affana JPB, Eckstein D., Weischer L (2019) Engaging with the Green Climate Fund: A civil society toolkit. Bonn.
  22. Maksimova SYu (2024) “Green” finance: features, instruments, and development challenges. Regional Problems of Economic Transformation 4: 368–375. https://doi.org/10.26726/1812-7096-2024-4-368-375
  23. Malikova OI, Surikov DO (2024) Current state and prospects for developing carbon integration in the Eurasian space. Gosudarstvennoye upravleniye. Elektronnyy vestnik 103: 71–80. https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-103-2024-71-80 (In Russ.).
  24. Maslova SV (2023) Taxonomies of “sustainable development” and “green” projects as legal instruments for achieving sustainable development goals and greening legislation. Legal Research 11: 98–107. https://doi.org/10.25136.2409-7136.202311.69104 (In Russ.).
  25. Migaleva TE, Podbiralina GV, Razumnova LL (2022) Convergence of positions member states of the EAEU on the climate agenda and carbon regulation. Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics 16(2): 41–50. https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2022-02-41-50 (In Russ.).
  26. Miroshnichenko OS, Mostovaya NA (2019) “Green” loan as a tool for “green” financing. Finance: theory and practice 23(2): 31–43. https://doi.org/ 10.26794/2587-5671 2019-23-2-31-43 (In Russ.).
  27. Muktadir-Al-Mukit D, Hossain MA (2020) Sustainable development and green financing. A study on the banking sector in Bangladesh. In: Singh A., Reji E. M. (eds.) Social entrepreneurship and sustainable development. 1st ed. Routledge India. Chapter 9. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003042396-13
  28. Murashko A (2023) Climate risks in the EAEU space: national approaches and joint solutions. Russia and the New States of Eurasia IV (LXI): 217–229.
  29. Panda P (2017) Green bond: A socially responsible investment (SRI) instrument. Research Bulletin 43(1): 97–113. (In Russ.).
  30. Petrosyants TV (2023) Current state of “green” financing in Kazakhstan. Colloquium-journal 29(188), 2023: 31–32. https://doi.org/10.24412/2520-6990-2023-29188-32-33 (In Russ.).
  31. Prudnikova AA (2023) Green financing for achieving sustainable development goals: Current state and prospects. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics, taxes & law. 16: 16–23. https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X 2023-16-3-16-23 (In Russ.).
  32. Porfiryev BV (2016) “Green” trends in the global financial system. World Economy and International Relations 60(9): 5–16. https://doi.org/ 10.20542/0131-2227-2016-60-9-5-16 (In Russ.).
  33. Report of the Institute of Research and Expertise VEB.RF. Using materials from the Eurasian Development Bank, IRIP VAVT, Institute of Economic Forecasting of the Russian Academy of Sciences. (December 2021). Moscow.
  34. Shadiyan MG (2023) Regulation of issues of financing “green” projects in the EAEU countries. State and Municipal Management. Scientific notes. 3: 139–146. https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-3-139-146 (In Russ.).
  35. Shugurov MV (2018a) Development of international legal regulation of scientific and technical cooperation and technology transfer in the climate sphere. In: Law and climate of the planet // Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation / ed. by Yu.A. Tikhomirov. Moscow: Justice, 38–49. (In Russ.).
  36. Shugurov MV (2018b) Promising Policy Efforts on Development and Transfer of environmentally sound technologies. Environmental Policy and Law 48(6):40–410. https://doi.org/10.3233/EPL-180107
  37. Shugurov MV (2019) Green climate fund: supporting the technology development and transfer. In: Proceedings of the roundtables discussion of the XVII Blischenko Congress. Moscow, 243–254.
  38. Shugurov MV (2021) Legal issues of development of cooperation between the EAEU member states in the field of green technologiesю. Agrarian and Land Law. 10(202): 142–144. (In Russ.).
  39. Skobelev DO, Volosatova AA, Guseva TV (2022) Application of the concept of the best available technologies in various systems green financing: international experience and prospects for use in the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union. Bulletin of Eurasian Science 14(2). URL: https://esj.today/PDF/36ECVN222.pdf (In Russ.).
  40. Tarkhanova EA, Fricler AV (2020) Green financing: Global understandings and Russian practices review. Journal of New Economy 21(4): 45–62. https://doi.org/10.29141/2658-5081-2020-21-4-3 (In Russ.).
  41. Vasilyeva EY, Bakrunov YO (2022) Prospects for the development of ESG-financing as an innovative approach to raising resources by Russian companies. Management Account 4–5: 544–551. (In Russ.).
  42. Vinokurov E, Albrecht K, Zaboev A, Klochkova E, Malakhov A, Pereboev V. (2023) Global green agenda in the Eurasian region. Eurasian region in the global green agenda. Almaty: Eurasian Development Bank (In Russ.).
  43. Volosatova AA, Uchenov AA, Skobelev DO (2022) Formation of the concept of introducing the principles of green economy in the Eurasian Economic Union: the role of harmonization of approaches to increasing resource efficiency. Bulletin of Eurasian Science 14(4). URL: https://esj.today/PDF/23ECVN422.pdf (In Russ.).
  44. Yerbolatova DO (2020) Current situation of green financing in Kazakhstan. Scince without borders 4(44): 95–101. (In Russ.).
  45. Yurgens IYu, Romov RB (2023) “Green integration” and the formation of a single sustainable development space in the EAEU format. Moscow: MGIMO. (In Russ.).
  46. Zimina OS, Finogenova YY (2021) ESG impact on the banking sector: new opportunities. Bull Moscow Univ Ministry Int Affairs Russia, 324‒330. https://doi.org/10.24412/2073-0454-2021-6- 324-330 (In Russ.).